What Has The US Congress Done So Far On UAP/UFOs?

What Has The US Congress Done So Far On UAP/UFOs? From initial skepticism to growing acknowledgment, the US Congress has played a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of UAP research and investigation. The involvement of the US Congress in discussing the issue of UAPs dates back decades, but the most intriguing engagements have occurred in recent years. Interest in the subject of UAPs has escalated, leading to widespread belief that the US government holds significant undisclosed information. A tug-of-war emerges between the secrecy faction and the disclosure faction within the US government, making it crucial to comprehend the unfolding events surrounding this matter. December 2017 – The New York Times Article What kickstarted the current UAP disclosure efforts was a New York Times article that was written by Helene Cooper, Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean. It spoke of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), a shadowy endeavor that investigated reports of unidentified flying objects, operated within the Pentagon’s confines, largely concealed from public view. Initiated in 2007, the program’s main funding came from then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who collaborated with billionaire entrepreneur Robert Bigelow, a proponent of space phenomena research.   Despite official claims that the program ended in 2012, insiders assert its persistence. While funding ceased, program members continued investigating episodes reported by military personnel, alongside their other defense-related duties. The program examined sightings of high-speed aircraft with peculiar propulsion behaviors and videos of encounters between unidentified objects and American military aircraft. The 2004 incident involving Navy fighter jets pursuing a mysterious oval object off the coast of San Diego showcases the enigma’s depth.   Former senators Harry Reid, Ted Stevens, and Daniel Inouye were instrumental in driving UAP research funding. However, the program was kept largely hidden, rooted in classified allocations. The program’s findings led some, like Mr. Bigelow, to claim firm belief in extraterrestrial existence and UAP visitations to Earth.  2019 – The Navy Confirms Soon the actors would emerge. Commander David Fravor and his colleague Alex Dietrich  were involved in the 2004 Nimitz Incident, as captured in the FLIR video. Ryan Graves and his squadron were witnesses to wave of UFO sightings on the eastern coast. They were responsible for capturing the Gimbal video. Further, Lie Elizondo and Chris Mellon would also make public appearances and explain the scale of threat that the US faced from the phenomena.   The NY Times article also presented three videos – Gimbal, Go Fast and FLIR. The videos were initially given to the press by Christopher Mellon, the former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. Around the same time, Luis Elizondo, the director of AATIP, had resigned from the Pentagon in October 2017 to protest government secrecy and opposition to the investigation, stating in a resignation letter to Defense Secretary James Mattis that the program was not being taken seriously.   As Elizondo explains, these objects showed no visible signs of propulsion, control surfaces, exhaust plumes etc, yet were capable of trans-medium travel, hypersonic speeds, and anti-gravity. The US Navy would later confirm these anomalies and begin briefing Members of Congress on the issue. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auITEKd4sjAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBtMbBPzqHY 2021 – The UAP Task Force Report Bipartisan efforts within Congress propelled the UAP issue forward. Closed-door interviews by the House and Senate Armed Services Committees with pilots like Chad Underwood, Alex Dietrich, David Fravor, and Ryan Graves escalated interest among politicians on Capitol Hill. The resulting discussions prompted elected officials to engage actively in the matter.   Deputy Secretary of Defense David L. Norquist’s authorization on August 4, 2020, marked the establishment of the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) Task Force (UAPTF), led by the Department of the Navy. The task force’s primary focus was enhancing UAP comprehension while assessing potential national security threats. Detecting, analyzing, and cataloging UAPs emphasized on personnel safety and operational security, signifying the Department of Defense’s dedication to comprehensive scrutiny.   The Senate Intelligence Committee took further steps by aiming to make UAP information public. Initially intended as part of the Intelligence Authorization Act for 2021, the request failed to pass. Subsequently, efforts were redirected to the Covid-19 relief bill, signed by Donald Trump in December 2020. Buried within this massive legislation was a provision requiring the Director of National Intelligence to collaborate with the Defense Department and disclose all government knowledge on UAPs. The Director of National Intelligence had 180 days to submit the report to Congress within 180 days, signaling a shift in attitude.  The Office of the Director of National Intelligence unveiled the UAPTF’s report to the public on June 25, 2021. Covering the period from 2004 to 2021, the investigation delved into 144 incidents exclusively reported by military personnel. Among these, a lone case was identified as a deflating balloon, while 143 remained unexplained. Intriguingly, 80 cases were captured by multiple sensors concurrently as witnessed by personnel. Patterns emerged in UAP attributes, encompassing size, shape, and propulsion. Startlingly, the data suggested that these unidentified aerial phenomena possessed remarkably advanced technologies, potentially altering the balance of power in combat scenarios. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZdg0g84HUM The report underscored a spectrum of capabilities, encompassing anti-gravity, rapid agile maneuvers, hypersonic speeds, low-observable signatures, and advanced propulsion devoid of sonic disruptions. As a conclusion, it firmly asserted that UAPs presented a significant national security risk and a potential hazard to aviation safety. The submission of a classified report to the Senate Intelligence Committee underscored the depth and intricacy of the subject matter.   The report stated, “While many UAPs in our dataset remain unidentified due to limited data or challenges in collection, processing, or analysis, we may require additional scientific knowledge to effectively collect, analyze, and characterize some of them. Such objects will be categorized as such until scientific advancements allow better understanding.” The UAPTF aimed to concentrate extra analysis on instances where UAPs exhibited unusual flight behaviors or unique signature management. Importantly, the report highlighted that the UAPTF had documented 11 cases of near misses between pilots and UAPs.   Furthermore, the report emphasized, “We currently lack data indicating any UAP as part of a